nfg.forums

NFG Forums => X68000 Software => Topic started by: craiganderson on September 30, 2014, 02:28:30 AM

Title: comparing single disk .xdf/.dim to .hds
Post by: craiganderson on September 30, 2014, 02:28:30 AM
hello
is there any advantage to loading a game via SINGLE DISK .xdf/.dim   VERSUS    .hds/.hdf??
one disk either way..so no swapping etc

quality?
speed?
it seems like the sizes of the .hds are greater than the .xdf .....better graphics?
or just extra stuff to help load .hds/.hdf etc?
thanks
craig
Title: Re: comparing single disk .xdf/.dim to .hds
Post by: eidis on September 30, 2014, 02:52:00 AM
 Hi CraigAnderson !

.xdf/.dim = floppy disk images
.hds/.hdf = hard drive images

Games always load noticeably faster from hard drive than from floppy disk. Otherwise there is no difference because the same files are used in both instances.

Keep the scene alive !
Eidis
Title: Re: comparing single disk .xdf/.dim to .hds
Post by: craiganderson on September 30, 2014, 02:55:22 AM
Quote from: eidis on September 30, 2014, 02:52:00 AM
Hi CraigAnderson !

.xdf/.dim = floppy disk images
.hds/.hdf = hard drive images

Games always load noticeably faster from hard drive than from floppy disk. Otherwise there is no difference because the same files are used in both instances.

Keep the scene alive !
Eidis

thank you very much for all of your help
Title: Re: comparing single disk .xdf/.dim to .hds
Post by: eidis on September 30, 2014, 02:57:44 AM
 Hi CraigAnderson !

It is always nice to see people working on projects which involve the X68000. Feel free to ask any questions no matter how advanced or simple.

Keep up the good work and....

Keep the scene alive !
Eidis